In the event you care about fishing or boating Colorado’s rivers, this ongoing authorized case ought to have relevance for you. Roger Hill is a 76-year-old Coloradan who likes to fish whereas standing on the mattress of a stream. One among his favourite spots is a stretch of the Arkansas River under Salida.
An area landowner claims that Hill is trespassing when he stands on the streambed adjoining to the landowner’s property. He has responded by repeatedly throwing rocks at Hill whereas he’s fishing and leaving threatening notes on his automotive. The landowner even shot at one among Hill’s fishing buddies, although he was thrown in jail for that little stunt.
Hill claims a proper to fish from the streambed on the grounds that the stretch of the Arkansas River the place he fishes is navigable and that the state of Colorado thereby owns the mattress of the stream. So he sued the landowner.
Now, Colorado has moved to dismiss the case, arguing that it can’t go ahead with out the state’s participation. In a sophisticated argument, the state additionally claims that as a result of it has not consented to being sued, the case should be dismissed. Thoughts you, the state may merely waive its immunity declare and help the precise of individuals like Hill to fish. As a substitute, the state is actively in search of to dam Hill’s declare that he has the precise to entry navigable streams.
The notion that states personal the beds of navigable streams derives from a constitutional precept often called the “equal footing doctrine.” It offers that when states enter the union, they accomplish that on an “equal footing” with different states. Although Colorado is residence to many substantial rivers and streams, none have ever been formally declared “navigable” for functions of figuring out title to the mattress.
It is a a lot greater drawback in Colorado than in most states. In Colorado, you’re deemed a trespasser in case you merely float over a riverbed adjoining to personal property. Consequently, Colorado leisure boaters and fisherman use Colorado’s waterways on the sufferance of personal landowners. One great way round this drawback is to have them declared “navigable” for title functions, and that’s what Roger Hill is in search of to do on the Arkansas River.
The U.S. Supreme Courtroom considers waterways to be navigable for title functions in the event that they had been used or may have been used on the time of statehood as highways for commerce. It’s well-known that fur merchants used the Arkansas River to maneuver their furs, and loggers as soon as despatched a whole bunch of hundreds of logs downstream to be used as railroad ties. That appears to be proof that the state owns the mattress of the river — not within the typical sense of a celebration proudly owning land, however as a protector of public rights.
The Supreme Courtroom’s most eloquent expression of the state as protector of entry got here within the context of a call upholding Illinois’ rights to the mattress of Lake Michigan in Chicago Harbor. In line with the Supreme Courtroom, title to the mattress of navigable water our bodies “is a title completely different in character from that which the state holds in lands meant on the market. … It’s a title held in belief for the individuals of the state, that they could benefit from the navigation of the waters, keep it up commerce over them, and have liberty of fishing therein, free of the obstruction or interference of personal events.”
If the state had been correctly exercising its belief accountability to the individuals of Colorado, then it could have filed this case itself on behalf of Roger Hill. In need of that, it’d not less than have intervened on his aspect after the lawsuit was filed, and even simply stayed out of the dispute.
As a substitute, it seeks to dismiss the case and thereby undermine all of the boaters and fishers who merely wish to train the rights assured to them by the U.S. Structure. Take into consideration what this implies: State leaders charged with defending public rights in navigable waters are actively in search of to dam these rights.
Colorado is famend for its outside recreation, and it appears foolhardy for it to intrude with residents in search of to train their constitutionally protected rights to state waterways. Come November, the individuals of Colorado will elect a brand new governor and a brand new legal professional common. We have to elect leaders who will get up for the individuals and defend our public rights, together with the general public’s constitutional proper to entry Colorado’s exceptional navigable waterways.
Mark Squillace is a contributor to Writers on the Vary, the opinion service ofHigh Nation Information (hcn.org). He’s professor of legislation on the College of Colorado Legislation College, and he represents Roger Hill professional bono within the ongoing dispute over Hill’s proper to entry the Arkansas River.
To ship a letter to the editor about this text, submit on-line or take a look at our pointers for tips on how to submit by e mail or mail.