Denver. A gold company said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is mismanaging the Superfund cleanup of virtually 50 earlier mining web sites in southwestern Colorado and should be eradicated as a result of the company in value.
Sunnyside Gold Corp., which owns mining property inside the Bonita Peak Superfund district, made the criticism Monday in a letter to the EPA. In a written assertion Tuesday, the EPA said it is following Superfund authorized pointers and is conducting an intensive investigation and cleanup.
The change was the latest skirmish in a long-running battle between Sunnyside and the EPA over the cleanup. The EPA has centered Sunnyside to help pay for the cleanup, and the company has resisted, launching quite a few challenges to the scale and administration of the enterprise.
Sunnyside’s letter said the EPA has a battle of curiosity on account of the company was accountable for a big spill of polluted water in 2015 from the Gold King Mine, one different web site inside the Superfund district.
An EPA-led contractor crew was doing excavation work on the doorway to the Gold King Mine in August 2015 when it inadvertently breached a particles pile that was holding once more wastewater contained within the mine.
An estimated 3 million gallons of wastewater poured out, carrying virtually 540 U.S. tons of metals, largely iron and aluminum. Rivers in Colorado, New Mexico and Utah had been polluted.
The spill resulted in lawsuits in direction of the EPA and prompted the company to create the Bonita Peak Superfund district.
“The conflict of interest is obvious, given EPA’s liability for the Gold King spill, which resulted in the Superfund listing and EPA being a defendant in multiple legal actions,” said the letter, signed by Sunnyside reclamation director Kevin Roach.
Roach said Sunnyside has already spent higher than $30 million over 30 years cleaning up its property inside the Superfund district and has made a measurable enchancment in water top quality. The company said the EPA is concentrating on it unfairly.
The EPA said Sunnyside ought to help pay for the Superfund cleanup on account of its earlier mining work contributed to very important water top quality points inside the house.
“EPA will continue to require the company to take actions to ensure that financial responsibility for cleanup is not shifted to taxpayers,” the company said.